While reading Amy Waldman’s, The Submission, I often
found myself annotating, in capital letters, IDENTITY. Therefore, while
scanning through my annotations, I began to consider a person’s identity. More
specifically, I asked myself: who defines a person? At first, the answer seemed
simple: a person’s choices and actions shape their character, so clearly, a
person defines himself. However, for characters such as Mohammad Khan and Laila,
societal judgments and prejudice shape the perception of their character. For
example, Laila reveals that following conflict in Iran, her birthplace, her mother
told her “not to tell anyone” her nationality (197). Waldman highlights Laila’s
mother’s warning tone to emphasize that society’s prejudice and fear of other
cultures affects an identity. Furthermore, the novelist recognizes that Laila
must live in fear of the consequences of society’s misconception of her
character due to prejudice. Clearly, the mother’s fear of the public’s bias
emphasizes that society does play a role in defining an identity. Similarly,
during an interview about his life following the memorial controversy, Mohammad
states that he had left America for India to live where “the name Mohammad
wouldn’t be a liability” (330). Waldman highlights the taxing diction of “liability”
to create an oppressive tone and to emphasize that due to Americans’ prejudice
towards his name, Mohammad could not shape his own identity. Furthermore, the
novelist stresses the injustice of Mohammad’s identity, as prejudice does not
define a person’s true character. Overall, The Submission made me
reconsider how I define my own identity. Although I like to believe that I alone
identify myself, I now realize that I must accept the preconceptions of others
and like Mohammad and Laila, I must find success despite judgment.
It wasn't only wickedness and scheming that made people unhappy, it was confusion and misunderstanding; above all, it was the failure to grasp the simple truth that other people are as real as you. -Ian McEwan
Translate
Saturday, June 30, 2012
Zahira's Choice
Following September 11, 2001, many Americans feared Muslims.
Anxiety overwhelmed them as many Americans misinterpreted the goals of Islam, a
peaceful religion. Consequently, fear and anger escalated into hate crimes
aimed toward Muslims as 1,200 more occurred in 2001 than in 2000. Accordingly,
in Amy Waldman’s 2011 novel, The Submission, Zahira Hussain, a victim of
a hate crime, discusses Islam with her attacker, Sean, who pulled off her head
scarf. However, Zahira attempts to educate Sean about Muslims, rather than
criticize him for his actions, and therefore fosters a greater understanding of
her faith. For example, upon hearing Sean’s distaste for her wearing of a head
scarf in America, Zahira states, “‘It’s my choice’” (204). Waldman emphasizes
Zahira’s choice to wear the scarf to stress the inaccuracy of the assumption that
Muslim women in America do not have the freedom of choice. Furthermore, Waldman
indirectly characterizes Zahira as independent, and criticizes Americans who do
not respect the girl’s choice to express her spirituality. Similarly, when
discussing Islam’s concept of the afterlife, Zahira stresses that “‘It’s [the
afterlife] about God. God’” (205). Waldman indirectly characterizes the girl as
pious through her repetition of “God” and stresses that Muslims, like
individuals of other religions, believe in something much greater than themselves.
Therefore, Zahira relates with Sean, and through that similarity, she enables
him to better understand her religion. Due to her approach when confronting
Sean, I favor Zahira. By embracing the country’s xenophobia and fostering
Americans’ understanding of her faith, Zahira achieves the goal that countless support
organizations strive to accomplish. Therefore, the girl inspires me, as her
tactics reveal that acceptance of prejudice and education best create
tolerance.
A Hero Without a Cape
As a child, teachers would ask me to describe my hero. Therefore,
the image I conceived as a child-a superhero with a cape-still resonates with
me today. Nevertheless, as a young adult, I must examine individuals who do not
wear capes and determine what I truly believe makes a hero. After much thought,
I have concluded that heroes do not waver from their beliefs and morals despite
opposition. Therefore, in Amy Waldman’s 2011 novel, The Submission,
which discusses the ramifications of a Muslim man’s selection to design the
9/11 memorial, one widow, Claire Burwell, exhibits true heroism. Claire, a member
of the jury panel for the memorial, argues that despite the designer’s
religion, he should still design the memorial as his design won. Although
Claire personally suffered the loss of her husband in the 9/11 attacks, she
still fights for the garden, even after discovering the religion of the
designer. Therefore, I would like to embody Claire because of her heroism and unwavering
support despite her struggles. For example, Claire mourns that both inside and
outside of the jury, “she was fighting alone” (101). The negative denotation of
“fighting” implies that Claire faces great aversion for her stance on the garden,
and that she stays firm despite this hatred. Therefore, Waldman indirectly
characterizes Claire as resilient and unwavering in her beliefs. Similarly,
Waldman highlights Claire’s support for her family by emphasizing that “William’s
[Claire’s son] vividly imagined garden needed safeguarding” (93). Waldman emphasizes
William’s support for the garden to imply that Claire continues to fight for
Khan’s design as it provides comfort for her children. Therefore, the novelist
indirectly characterizes Claire as loving and supportive to emphasize that the
mother fights for her children despite obstacles. Lastly, when the American
public rejects the garden due to Khan’s religion, she reminds them that “if you
let them change you, they’ve [the 9/11 attackers] won” (98). Waldman indirectly
characterizes Claire as strong and determined and implies that Claire will not
change her beliefs regardless of the struggles that she faces. Furthermore,
Waldman highlights the widow’s belief that the attackers win when Americans
change their values to imply that Claire will stay moral to support her family
and country. Overall, I hope to embody Claire as I greatly respect her for her unwavering
support for both her family and her beliefs. To me, she not only exemplifies
heroism, but also shapes my definition of a hero.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)